This is not the first time I have had to state this publically, and again for the record.

Until 921 offers a formal interpretation on the matter, the stated procedure specified in 13.1.6.1.3.4 would comply and suffice for the MAJORITY of the fireground situations. There are those that express their personal opinions Of course, but even those on the 921 TC are required to follow the NFPA rules on this and every other topic.

"Interpretations of NFPA Standards
A statement, written or oral, that is not processed in accordance with Section 6 of the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards shall not be considered the official position of NFPA or any of its Committees and shall not be considered to be, nor be relied upon as, a Formal Interpretation."

I submit if this is such a major problem and issue in the field, then perhaps the 921 gurus can offer some further clarification or changes to the next edition of NFPA 921 to correctly and succinctly state their intended positions and TC recommended procedures. That way there is no discrepancy in the future.

AND YES I WROTE THIS IN A HUMOROUS TONE SO DONT TAKE IT SO SERIOUSLY!

Chris