Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit
Posted by: John Lentini (IP Logged)
Date: August 09, 2020 12:46PM

400 is even harder. Believe it or not, the claim has been moderated from 2002 when a story about this expert said, "Dolence, who said he has handled 16,000 fire investigations in the past 21 years, insists the Stanley fire was not electrical."

Akron Beacon Journal, February 8, 2002.

That's just over 2 per day, every day.



Subject Views Written By Posted
  New Daubert case from the Third Circuit 848 John Lentini 08/08/2020 06:40PM
  Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit 522 Tuomas Palvia 08/09/2020 03:22AM
  Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit 502 J L Mazerat 08/09/2020 09:35AM
  Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit 542 John Lentini 08/09/2020 12:46PM
  Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit 517 J L Mazerat 08/10/2020 11:53AM
  Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit 493 Sir Gary 08/10/2020 12:04PM
  Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit 499 Fire 08/11/2020 08:36PM
  Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit 471 Fire 08/12/2020 09:38AM
  Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit 513 John Lentini 08/12/2020 02:50PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.