A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: New Daubert case from the Third Circuit
Posted by:
John Lentini (IP Logged)
Date: August 09, 2020 12:46PM
400 is even harder. Believe it or not, the claim has been moderated from 2002 when a story about this expert said, "Dolence, who said he has handled 16,000 fire investigations in the past 21 years, insists the Stanley fire was not electrical."
Akron Beacon Journal, February 8, 2002.
That's just over 2 per day, every day.