Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: Digital Camera choice
Posted by: Sir Gary (IP Logged)
Date: April 15, 2010 10:50AM

I use a Pentax SLR.
It's images/capabilities are no better than any other,
but I chose it because:
- It's got a steelframe; i.e. sturdier than most.
- I needed a horseshoe to bolt a big-enough flash onto for those big matt-black interiors.
- A SLR can take other lenses, like a wide-angle for indoors.
I fit UV-filters to my lenses; they are $10 each and easier and cheaper to keep clean
(also I keep losing those matt-black lens caps amongst the fire debris)
- It was more dust/moisture-proof than the other offerings in it's price-class.
- Every single Pentax SLR-lense ever made fits onto it.
- And the clincher was:
the SLR, it's flash and my headlamp all run off AA-penlights, available EVERYWHERE.
I use rechargeables, but keep a few packets of the Lithium disposables handy;
the rechargeables barely last 500 shots, but the Lithium-AA's easily double that.

That said, a $100-compact is useful for hard-to reach voids,
like up chimneys or behind motor-vehicle ancillaries;
also a cheap, light backup when your SLR is down
(like recently, when the SLR's lense was fogged up inside...)

Find something with optical stabilization and dust-cleaning optics.
Also, good low-light auto-focusing and -image-quality is important.
Useful to have a video-function too, for those tests.
Since it’s gonna hang off your neck, try keep the weight down.
I shoot in RAW for photo-quality and validation purposes,
so check that yours can too if this important to you.

Good luck.

- Gary KEMP B.Sc NAFI CFEI & -CFII
Port Elizabeth
SOUTH AFRICA

Disclaimer :
Any question, viewpoint, opinion or comment attached to this post
is possibly/probably void of relevance, truth, validity or anything else
which anyone may choose to use/quote/assign to/against me in/out of context
and should only be considered as a pinup-/sounding board/soap box
in which (ir)relevant banter may be exchanged for educational/entertainment purposes etc.

As with all things - "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good."



Subject Views Written By Posted
  Digital Camera choice 4240 Anonymous User 04/15/2010 10:24AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1803 Sir Gary 04/15/2010 10:50AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1487 MIKE 04/15/2010 11:44AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1439 Anonymous User 04/15/2010 06:51PM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1329 Sir Gary 04/16/2010 03:55AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1156 Anonymous User 04/16/2010 09:00AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1140 Anonymous User 04/16/2010 09:04AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1129 Sir Gary 04/16/2010 10:18AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice REVIEWS 1498 MIKE 04/16/2010 09:29AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice REVIEWS 1278 MIKE 04/16/2010 09:30AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1155 C K Williams 04/16/2010 02:14PM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1044 MIKE 04/16/2010 03:36PM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1023 MIKE 04/24/2010 12:35AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1583 Nick Markowitz 04/26/2010 07:12AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 986 MIKE 04/26/2010 08:10AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 962 Nick Markowitz 04/26/2010 05:48PM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 965 Ted Pagels 04/27/2010 08:58AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 946 MIKE 04/29/2010 08:44AM
  Re: Digital Camera choice 1068 Larry Booth 05/02/2010 07:37PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.