I find it interesting that this tragic incident occurred in 1985 and that a lack of basic understanding of flashover was one of the contributing factors. I guess I was fortunate in my career to have mentors and educators who taught me correctly about this long before this event occurred.

For those who have known me throughout my career, I have long said that there were folks being unjustly denied their insurance and their freedom because of there were those in the "profession" who lack even the most basic of understanding of fire behavior.

As John and others (including myself), who have worked on behalf of those accused and/or convicted based on junk science, this is not an easy fight. It is extremely difficult to overturn a conviction. In current cases, many of those who continue to make calls based on junk science, make impressive presentations even through their theories are pure BS.

Individuals who are truly guilty of arson deserve to be denied their insurance and be subject to appropriate criminal penalties. However, no one deserves to be accused, let alone convicted, based on junk science. Everyone also deserves a legitimate defense as opposed to someone testifying only to cloud the issue or muddy the waters.

James G. Munger, PhD, FIFireE, CFPS
www.qdotengineering.com
W3NFA