Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: Still even though it is 2014 an intense fire = arson. Really!
Posted by: G Van Doren ()
Date: October 24, 2014 12:59PM

Oops I inadvertently left off necessary quotation marks. These are quotes from the referenced articles. Correcting below.

"In response to Swanson’s questions, Steele County Sheriff’s Office Investigator Troy Matejcek testified that he did not detect or find evidence of any accelerant at the scene. Wood samples from the fire’s supposed origin point was tested by the state as well as the insurance company. Both tests came back negative for accelerants.

According to the complaint, authorities believe an accelerant was used due to evidence of an intense fire."

Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Still even though it is 2014 an intense fire = arson. Really! 2149 G Van Doren 10/23/2014 06:21PM
Re: Still even though it is 2014 an intense fire = arson. Really! 1261 Cy Holmes 10/24/2014 12:50AM
Re: Still even though it is 2014 an intense fire = arson. Really! 1200 G Van Doren 10/24/2014 12:59PM
Re: Still even though it is 2014 an intense fire = arson. Really! 1255 John J. Lentini, CFEI 10/24/2014 02:29PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.