A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: Undertermined vs. accidential or deliberate
Posted by:
dahebert (IP Logged)
Date: April 06, 2007 09:57AM
You can, but what you are really saying is UNDETERMINED. If you don't know, it is not a failure. I often write something to the effect of :
blah, blah, this fire was started with human involvement, however, at this time intent cannot be determined. Until evidence of intent is developed this fire is classified as UNDETERMINED.
From a law enforcement perspective I can still investigate an undetermined fire. Of course, from a private sector perspective you may very well be able to call the fire because of a much different standard of proof. I will not try to explain it since I am not typing from that perspective and it is not my place...
This is my opinion, but I've been wrong before. (as Pat often points out)
Dan Hebert