Fire/Arson Investigations : Fire/Arson Investigations
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Recent Ruling Florida Supreme Court---Frye NOT Daubert
Posted by: Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant (IP Logged)
Date: November 05, 2018 01:30PM
A recent article just published by a national law firm has stated in summation:
The Florida Supreme Court on October 15, 2018, in the case of Delisle v. Crane, Case (No. SC16-2182), reportedly stated “With our decision today, we reaffirm that Frye, not Daubert, is the appropriate test in Florida courts.”
As with any posting here, I recommend anyone interested in this topic perform their own due diligence and research to verify the authenticity of the information themselves. I am just reposting the generic discussion for the good of the industry.
Chris
The Florida Supreme Court on October 15, 2018, in the case of Delisle v. Crane, Case (No. SC16-2182), reportedly stated “With our decision today, we reaffirm that Frye, not Daubert, is the appropriate test in Florida courts.”
As with any posting here, I recommend anyone interested in this topic perform their own due diligence and research to verify the authenticity of the information themselves. I am just reposting the generic discussion for the good of the industry.
Chris
| Subject | Views | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
 Recent Ruling Florida Supreme Court---Frye NOT Daubert |
968 | Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant | 11/05/2018 01:30PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.