Fire/Arson Investigations : Fire/Arson Investigations
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Appalachian Power Co., Case No. 7:19-cv-00380 (W.D. Va.)
Posted by: John Lentini (IP Logged)
Date: May 20, 2021 01:21PM
[www.casemine.com]
The link above will take you to the decision. This was a major screw-up on the part of the INSURANCE ADJUSTER, not the fire investigator. The fire investigator properly advised the insurance adjuster that the scene needed to be made available to the power company and he failed to take that sound advice.
There was a motion to exclude the fire investigator's testimony but the court never addressed the issue because they dismissed the case.
The link above will take you to the decision. This was a major screw-up on the part of the INSURANCE ADJUSTER, not the fire investigator. The fire investigator properly advised the insurance adjuster that the scene needed to be made available to the power company and he failed to take that sound advice.
There was a motion to exclude the fire investigator's testimony but the court never addressed the issue because they dismissed the case.
| Subject | Views | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
 Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Appalachian Power Co., Case No. 7:19-cv-00380 (W.D. Va.)
|
721 | Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant | 05/20/2021 01:10AM |
|
Re: Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Appalachian Power Co., Case No. 7:19-cv-00380 (W.D. Va.) |
497 | John Lentini | 05/20/2021 01:21PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.