A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: Determining when arc took place.
Posted by:
John Lentini (IP Logged)
Date: November 08, 2022 02:38PM
Dr. Anderson's hypothesis was thoroughly refuted. Hot liquids, like molten copper, do not absorb gases from their surroundings. They actually release gases. Also, the technique required the consideration of an "environmental cap" which could be as deep or shallow as you need to make the results what you want them to be.
Journal of Forensic Sciences V 42 #4, 1997. The surface analysis of copper arc beads—a critical review Howitt, DG
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, CA.
Abstract
The chemical composition of arc beads has been purported to reflect the local atmospheric conditions at the precise moment when the arc occurs. It has further been claimed that Auger analyses, taken from beneath the surface contamination layers of an arc bead, can be used to distinguish whether the arcing was the cause of a fire. The hypothesis is that because atmospheric gases are trapped in the arc bead when it solidifies, the concentrations of gases inside the bead will reflect ambient conditions when the arc causes the fire, but rich concentrations of combustion gases when it does not. A review of the literature on the solubility of gases in liquid copper indicates that there is no scientific justification for this hypothesis.