Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: lightning strikes; direct- vs indirect-
Posted by: Sir Gary (IP Logged)
Date: January 17, 2020 01:00AM

chicken wire probably wasn't bonded - Induction current?
found an article where 100A was generated in a unconnected buried coaxial cable...

As for the 'rafter area', see 'after' photo attached...

Attachments: after.jpg (372.8kB)  


Subject Views Written By Posted
  lightning strikes; direct- vs indirect- 1097 Sir Gary 01/16/2020 06:09AM
  Re: lightning strikes; direct- vs indirect- 737 Sir Gary 01/16/2020 06:23AM
  Re: lightning strikes; direct- vs indirect- 677 Fire 01/16/2020 08:54AM
  Re: lightning strikes; direct- vs indirect- 701 Sir Gary 01/17/2020 01:00AM
  Re: lightning strikes; direct- vs indirect- 729 John Lentini 01/16/2020 12:02PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.