Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: Question: Public Comment Requested
Posted by: PMK140 (IP Logged)
Date: September 30, 2006 07:37PM

Jim,

I'm afraid that past presentations experience and references are of little help when the problem id pseudo-science and misinformation. We all have seen examples where the students, and even the sponsoring agencies, are not in a position to judge the quality of the instruction and course content.

Not too long ago there quite a flap about bad science and instruction on this very forum. In that flap, a prominent fire investigation organization was chided for sponsoring instruction which included terrible examples of bad science. In that case many of the students reported that they thought the content of the course, and the quality of the instructor was excellent, when in fact, much of the course content was claptrap.

Pat Kennedy, CFEI, CFPS, MIFireE
Fire and Explosion Analyst
Sarasota, Florida
[www.kennedy-fire.com]



Subject Views Written By Posted
  Question: Public Comment Requested 1807 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 09/28/2006 11:48AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 1017 MIKE 09/28/2006 12:31PM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 988 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 09/28/2006 11:52PM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 967 Mike Herzberg 09/29/2006 06:19AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 989 RDS 09/29/2006 06:54AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 981 matchkatcher 09/29/2006 06:56AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 948 jgmcfps 09/29/2006 07:14AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 934 cda 09/29/2006 07:57AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 932 Ted Pagels 09/29/2006 03:27PM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 985 k9team 09/30/2006 05:57AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 1005 PMK140 09/30/2006 09:58AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 949 jgmcfps 09/30/2006 11:07AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 959 PMK140 09/30/2006 07:37PM
  Point well made 989 jgmcfps 10/01/2006 09:13AM
  Re: Point well made 1017 GW Roberts 10/01/2006 04:03PM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 915 Anthony Tester 10/01/2006 07:54PM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested - Update 959 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 10/02/2006 12:23AM
  Re: Question: Public Comment Requested 964 Jonathan Squires 10/11/2006 07:44AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.