A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
Posted by:
Gerald Hurst (IP Logged)
Date: August 20, 2006 06:16PM
The ATF should certainly hope so, if they are going to continue to use Mr. DeHaan to bolster their cases.
The important question about any Ph.D. degree is whether it was merely awarded or actually earned.
There are three basic types of Ph.D. degrees:
1. Classical
2. Political
3. Mail order
They all come complete with a certificate.
The classical degrees includes those that were earned by poor souls who studied and worked in the laboratory six or seven days a week until the wee hours for many years, usually on a budget way below the poverty level.
The political or honorary Ph.D. is the sort bestowed upon a friend or colleague of an influential academician or university big-wig, sometimes as a reciprocal favor. In the old days, this type of degree was often made of different alphabet soup so that one could tell the difference (e.g., D.Sc. rather than Ph.D.).
The mail order Ph.D. is, well, a mail order Ph.D.
How do you tell the practical difference? In the absence of of information on whether the degree was "earned," the best method is to read the thesis to see the quality and difficulty of the work and the accuracy of the conclusions.
If you are planning to hire a Ph.D. to do actual technical work, you should usually stick to the first category.
Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
2394 |
John J. Lentini, CFEI |
07/03/2006 05:36PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1430 |
dazedandconfused |
07/03/2006 06:18PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1280 |
Jim Mazerat |
07/04/2006 10:34AM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1291 |
dazedandconfused |
07/04/2006 11:32AM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1282 |
Richard C. Howard CFI,CFEI,K-9 |
07/04/2006 12:23PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1294 |
Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant |
07/04/2006 03:21PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1156 |
Richard C. Howard CFI,CFEI,K-9 |
07/04/2006 03:41PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1223 |
dazedandconfused |
07/04/2006 04:35PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1260 |
Richard C. Howard CFI,CFEI,K-9 |
07/04/2006 08:53PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1270 |
dazedandconfused |
07/04/2006 09:15PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1230 |
jgmcfps |
07/29/2006 10:08AM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1288 |
Gerald Hurst |
07/29/2006 11:57AM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1159 |
Richard C. Howard CFI,CFEI,K-9 |
07/29/2006 06:00PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1182 |
jgmcfps |
07/29/2006 09:19PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1149 |
Richard C. Howard CFI,CFEI,K-9 |
07/29/2006 09:38PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1010 |
Ted Pagels |
08/22/2006 09:02AM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1280 |
G Van Doren |
08/20/2006 10:30AM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1141 |
SJAvato |
08/20/2006 04:51PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough |
1162 |
Gerald Hurst |
08/20/2006 06:16PM |
Re: Silence is not assent, but enough is enough
|
1148 |
estauffer |
08/21/2006 03:36AM |