Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: Significant error rate
Posted by: MIJ (IP Logged)
Date: February 12, 2007 10:54PM

Jim

I share your concern. I believe I understand your point. An error rate of 5% adds up to huge numbers in potential errors. With "Folks who attend seminars" feeling the error rate is at least 20% according to Mr. Lentini's unscientific poll. And having 51% as a goal we are setting ourselves up for inconsistent accuracy. I am well aware of how fire investigation has evolved since the existence of 921. But to think we have to continue to wait to imporve the error rate for Myth Believers to retire or die seems sad. I'm not trying to be critical. The truth of what the potential error rate MAY be coming from someone who has had as much or more to do with the advances in fire investigation as anyone is still threatening. Jim the answer to your question is NO its not acceptable.



Subject Views Written By Posted
  Significant error rate 1593 Jim Mazerat 02/12/2007 03:17PM
  Re: Significant error rate 1187 John J. Lentini, CFEI 02/12/2007 09:30PM
  Re: Significant error rate 974 MIJ 02/12/2007 10:54PM
  Re: Significant error rate 895 SJAvato 02/13/2007 10:41AM
  Re: Significant error rate 879 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 11:17AM
  Re: Significant error rate 1052 dcarpenter 02/13/2007 10:44AM
  Re: Significant error rate 817 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 11:34AM
  Re: Significant error rate 870 dcarpenter 02/13/2007 11:56AM
  Re: Significant error rate 882 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 10:48AM
  Re: Significant error rate 829 dcarpenter 02/13/2007 10:49AM
  Re: Significant error rate 855 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 11:39AM
  Re: Significant error rate 903 John J. Lentini, CFEI 02/14/2007 10:42AM
  Re: Significant error rate 881 SJAvato 02/13/2007 11:46AM
  Re: Significant error rate 902 PMK140 02/13/2007 06:37PM
  Re: Significant error rate 842 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 07:29PM
  Re: Significant error rate 873 Jim Mazerat 02/15/2007 12:08PM
  Re: Significant error rate 798 MIJ 02/15/2007 02:30PM
  Re: Significant error rate 867 Jim Mazerat 02/15/2007 04:32PM
  Re: Significant error rate 822 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 07:59PM
  Re: Significant error rate 894 SJAvato 02/13/2007 10:33PM
  Re: Significant error rate 869 Jim Mazerat 02/14/2007 10:50AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.