Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: Significant error rate
Posted by: PMK140 (IP Logged)
Date: February 13, 2007 06:37PM

Somebody is missing the point here. In order for an scientific, engineering, or fire investigation opinion to be heard in a court room, that opinion must be held to a reasonable degree of scientific, engineering, or fire investigation certainty. This has nothing to do with whether the opinion is that something is suspected, possible, probable or certain.

I may express an opinion in court that someting is possible, but that opinion must be to a reasonable degree of scientific, engineering, or fire investigation certainty. The degree of certainty to which I hold that opinion has nothing to do with what the opinion is. We're talking "apples" and "oranges" here.

Pat Kennedy, CFEI, CFPS, MIFireE
Fire and Explosion Analyst
Sarasota, Florida
[www.kennedy-fire.com]



Subject Views Written By Posted
  Significant error rate 1592 Jim Mazerat 02/12/2007 03:17PM
  Re: Significant error rate 1187 John J. Lentini, CFEI 02/12/2007 09:30PM
  Re: Significant error rate 974 MIJ 02/12/2007 10:54PM
  Re: Significant error rate 894 SJAvato 02/13/2007 10:41AM
  Re: Significant error rate 878 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 11:17AM
  Re: Significant error rate 1052 dcarpenter 02/13/2007 10:44AM
  Re: Significant error rate 816 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 11:34AM
  Re: Significant error rate 869 dcarpenter 02/13/2007 11:56AM
  Re: Significant error rate 881 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 10:48AM
  Re: Significant error rate 829 dcarpenter 02/13/2007 10:49AM
  Re: Significant error rate 854 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 11:39AM
  Re: Significant error rate 902 John J. Lentini, CFEI 02/14/2007 10:42AM
  Re: Significant error rate 880 SJAvato 02/13/2007 11:46AM
  Re: Significant error rate 901 PMK140 02/13/2007 06:37PM
  Re: Significant error rate 841 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 07:29PM
  Re: Significant error rate 873 Jim Mazerat 02/15/2007 12:08PM
  Re: Significant error rate 797 MIJ 02/15/2007 02:30PM
  Re: Significant error rate 866 Jim Mazerat 02/15/2007 04:32PM
  Re: Significant error rate 821 Jim Mazerat 02/13/2007 07:59PM
  Re: Significant error rate 893 SJAvato 02/13/2007 10:33PM
  Re: Significant error rate 868 Jim Mazerat 02/14/2007 10:50AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.