A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden
Posted by:
dazedandconfused (IP Logged)
Date: July 03, 2006 12:41PM
I'm not really sure who all is involved in the testing. They have spent nearly a 1/2 million dollars investigating the case. I know they did leave the state to somewhere in Tennesee where they supposedely constructed the house as a model. I know they have been to multiple fire investigation seminars discussing this case with others. No one thus far has given me any information as to anyone questioning the findings of Dr. Dehaan, aside from the defense of course. I have heard briefly an explanation on how he came to his finding, and what went into the full testing, and it sounds very thorough and convincing. On top of the circumstantial evidence. Basically there is so much outside evidence that points to her, that the only way the accused can hope to get away with it, is if they couldn't prove it arson. The only way they can do that, is to get rid of Dehaans testimony, because nothing the defense has come up with to rebuttal comes close.