Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden
Posted by: dazedandconfused (IP Logged)
Date: July 03, 2006 12:41PM

I'm not really sure who all is involved in the testing. They have spent nearly a 1/2 million dollars investigating the case. I know they did leave the state to somewhere in Tennesee where they supposedely constructed the house as a model. I know they have been to multiple fire investigation seminars discussing this case with others. No one thus far has given me any information as to anyone questioning the findings of Dr. Dehaan, aside from the defense of course. I have heard briefly an explanation on how he came to his finding, and what went into the full testing, and it sounds very thorough and convincing. On top of the circumstantial evidence. Basically there is so much outside evidence that points to her, that the only way the accused can hope to get away with it, is if they couldn't prove it arson. The only way they can do that, is to get rid of Dehaans testimony, because nothing the defense has come up with to rebuttal comes close.



Subject Views Written By Posted
  To dazed and confused 2117 PMK140 07/01/2006 04:23PM
  Re: To dazed and confused 1435 dazedandconfused 07/02/2006 11:49AM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1649 PMK140 07/02/2006 12:50PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1300 dazedandconfused 07/02/2006 01:21PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1280 PMK140 07/02/2006 02:33PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1277 Jim Mazerat 07/02/2006 05:11PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1235 dazedandconfused 07/03/2006 03:05AM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1202 Mark Goodson 07/03/2006 08:31AM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1236 dazedandconfused 07/03/2006 12:54PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1227 Jim Mazerat 07/03/2006 10:15AM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1168 dazedandconfused 07/03/2006 12:41PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1167 cda 07/03/2006 01:19PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1132 dazedandconfused 07/03/2006 03:43PM
  Re:Correction: Sample analysis 1196 John J. Lentini, CFEI 07/03/2006 04:25PM
  Re: Re:Correction: Sample analysis 1173 dazedandconfused 07/03/2006 05:18PM
  Re: Re:Correction: Sample analysis 1103 Richard C. Howard CFI,CFEI,K-9 07/04/2006 12:07PM
  Re: Re:Correction: Sample analysis 1075 dazedandconfused 07/04/2006 04:46PM
  Re: Re:Correction: Sample analysis 1101 dazedandconfused 07/04/2006 04:52PM
  Re: Re:Correction: Sample analysis 1249 PMK140 07/04/2006 06:11PM
  Re: Re:Correction: Sample analysis 1142 dazedandconfused 07/04/2006 06:25PM
  Re: Re:Correction: Sample analysis 1182 PMK140 07/04/2006 06:27PM
  Re: Re:Correction: Sample analysis 1229 dazedandconfused 07/04/2006 07:04PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1261 PMK140 07/04/2006 05:36AM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1153 Jim Mazerat 07/04/2006 10:38AM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1239 PMK140 07/04/2006 11:12AM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1129 Jim Mazerat 07/04/2006 12:13PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1120 PMK140 07/04/2006 12:15PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1200 Jim Mazerat 07/04/2006 12:25PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1235 cda 07/04/2006 09:49PM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Joe Hayden 1271 PMK140 07/05/2006 04:33AM
  Re: To dazed and confused - Polygraph 1235 Mark Goodson 07/07/2006 08:26AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.