Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A
Posted by: Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant (IP Logged)
Date: July 08, 2007 11:23AM

Pat:

I appreciate your posting and the information you provided is informative for all. However, like I said in my original posting, I am looking for documentation of any cases where a fire investigator was discredited and/or testimony tossed strictly due to a 1033 challenge. I have received one response (Thank you RF- you know who you are) but I have still not been able to verify its content due to the weekend. Anyone else have any experiences they can provide?

I understand your points but in all reality, at least out here on the west coast in the 9th circus, it probably won't be as big of a deal as one would hope. The reason is mainly because for one...engineers are technically not subject to its requirements given the specific legal wording in their Engineering Licenses which allow them through their formal education and training to determine (generic standard definition here):

"(1) “Practice of engineering” or “practice of professional engineering” means doing any of the following:

(a) Performing any professional service or creative work requiring engineering education, training and experience.

(b) Applying special knowledge of the mathematical, physical and engineering sciences to such professional services or creative work as consultation, investigation, testimony, evaluation, planning, design and services during construction, manufacture or fabrication for the purpose of ensuring compliance with specifications and design, in connection with any public or private utilities, structures, buildings, machines, equipment, processes, works or projects."

In addition, they may not be subject to the requirements due to NFPA's 1033 Title and Scope states, "NFPA 1033: Standard for Professional Qualifications for Fire Investigator" & "Document Scope: This standard shall identify the professional level of job performance requirements for fire investigators." It does not discuss anything about Engineers nor their legal practice and training as an Engineer. Some might think this is a moot point, but in fact it is not.

As you are aware, Fire Investigators by law are required to be licensed PI's in 41 of the 50 states, with exception of those few who have decided that we are not subject to their requirements or are exempt through various laws. However, only a few states have decided that engineers need to also be licensed also as fire investigators. Heck, even recently the Alabama Supreme Court decided that Fire Investigators must be licensed as Engineers even though the Alabama Engineering Board stated that Fire Investigators are not engineers and do not need to be licensed (Makes you wonder where this one is heading Judicial vs Executive Conflict).

My point is that currently Engineers are exempt from statutory PI requirements due to their statutory language and and are even allowed to practice fire investigation without being certified. By definition they are subject to eh requirements of 921, but they may not be subject to the requirements of 1033 by strict definition alone. Many attorneys I have worked with won't discuss 1033 because while it is a standard for fire investigators, it is NOT a standard for engineers and therefore they are not subject to its requirements.

I truly hope that 1033 will be applied evenly across the board to ALL who practice fire investigation, regardless of whether they are engineers or true C&O's. Maybe that is something the 1033 TC should consider in a TIA or next edition. It is my opinion that the standard PI Legal Definition should be included in the next edition of 1033 and maybe even the title of the Document changed to be more technically accurate and more widely encompass ALL who practice our profession.

(d) The cause of or responsibility for fires, libels, losses, accidents, damages or injuries to persons or property; or (e) Evidence to be used before any court, board, officer, referee, arbitrator or investigation committee."

Perhaps also Pat, this is something NAFI may want to look into as well to take whatever action is deemed necessary.

I hope I did not offend anyone here, but the playing field needs to be leveled and kept fair for all to work in.

Have a safe and happy week.

Chris



Subject Views Written By Posted
  Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 1884 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/07/2007 01:34AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 1005 FM-12 07/07/2007 01:23PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 1128 Hunter B. (Terry) Lacy 07/07/2007 09:48PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 1022 PMK140 07/08/2007 07:17AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 965 PMK140 07/08/2007 07:23AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 985 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/08/2007 11:23AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 959 PMK140 07/08/2007 01:30PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 919 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/09/2007 02:03AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 932 PMK140 07/09/2007 07:46AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 1011 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/09/2007 05:23PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 831 PMK140 07/09/2007 08:14PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 834 Hunter B. (Terry) Lacy 07/10/2007 11:09AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 906 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/10/2007 11:39AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 852 Hunter B. (Terry) Lacy 07/10/2007 12:32PM
  Re: Licensing Agency Contacts 857 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/10/2007 01:02PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 838 Jonathan Squires 07/16/2007 09:01AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 839 Hunter B. (Terry) Lacy 07/16/2007 09:19AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 816 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/16/2007 11:21PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 855 Jonathan Squires 07/18/2007 08:01AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 877 John J. Lentini, CFEI 07/18/2007 10:31AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 794 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/18/2007 06:00PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 819 Jonathan Squires 07/26/2007 06:35AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 778 Hunter B. (Terry) Lacy 07/26/2007 07:48AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 774 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/26/2007 02:20PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 903 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/10/2007 01:15PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 986 Hunter B. (Terry) Lacy 07/10/2007 09:47AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 927 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/10/2007 11:02AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 903 PMK140 07/09/2007 08:02AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 890 thattwick 07/09/2007 02:59PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 897 ForensicEEnMD 07/16/2007 03:26PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 822 MIJ 07/16/2007 09:25PM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 827 ForensicEEnMD 07/17/2007 07:52AM
  Re: Really - How Many People Use 1033 - Q&A 858 Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant 07/18/2007 01:58AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.