Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: One Question
Posted by: John J. Lentini, CFEI (IP Logged)
Date: February 21, 2007 10:59AM

Jim:

Your statement,"I agree some courts are putting more emphasis on the document than was intended by the National Fire Protection Association,"suggests that you think I said that. I certainly did not mean that. The recognition of NFPA 921 as a standard of care by courts or any other body is consistent with its intended use.

A standard of care is not mandatory, but failing to follow it may, in some circumstances, be construed as negligent. Conclusions based on investigations that vary significantly from the guidance provided in 921, especially when those conclusions involve the misinterpretation of post-fire artifacts, are likley to be deemed unrelaible.

John Lentini, CFI, D-ABC
Fire Investigation Consultant
Florida Keys
[www.firescientist.com]



Subject Views Written By Posted
  One Question 1876 Jim Mazerat 02/20/2007 06:00PM
  Re: One Question 1142 PMK140 02/20/2007 08:37PM
  Re: One Question 968 Jim Mazerat 02/20/2007 09:13PM
  Re: One Question 1159 John J. Lentini, CFEI 02/21/2007 12:33AM
  Re: One Question 1079 Jim Mazerat 02/21/2007 09:52AM
  Re: One Question 979 John J. Lentini, CFEI 02/21/2007 10:59AM
  Re: One Question 1037 Jim Mazerat 02/21/2007 12:32PM
  Re: One Question 1028 Gerald Hurst 02/21/2007 01:06PM
  Re: One Question 1057 Jim Mazerat 02/21/2007 01:22PM
  Re: One Question 1017 ssklar 02/22/2007 10:57AM
  Re: One Question 990 Jim Mazerat 02/22/2007 11:45AM
  Re: One Question 1046 Tony La Palio 02/22/2007 02:58PM
  Re: One Question 1016 Jim Mazerat 02/22/2007 03:05PM
  Re: Great Answer to What White Smoke Means 1024 Mike Learmonth 02/25/2007 09:58AM
  Re: One Question 960 ssklar 02/23/2007 04:52PM
  Re: One Question 1065 Jim Mazerat 02/23/2007 07:10PM
  Re: One Question 1001 ssklar 02/24/2007 11:48PM
  Re: One Question 1038 Jim Mazerat 02/25/2007 10:59AM
  Re: One Question 987 MIJ 02/25/2007 12:10PM
  Re: One Question 1034 Jim Mazerat 02/25/2007 12:32PM
  Re: One Question 935 ssklar 02/25/2007 04:56PM
  Re: One Question 1536 Jim Mazerat 02/25/2007 05:28PM
  Re: One Question 964 ssklar 02/26/2007 08:27AM
  Re: One Question 905 Jim Mazerat 02/26/2007 09:59AM
  Re: One Question 930 Jim Mazerat 02/25/2007 07:29PM
  Re: One Question 989 PMK140 02/25/2007 08:02PM
  Re: One Question 909 Jim Mazerat 02/25/2007 09:11PM
  It's a paradigm 1167 SJAvato 02/21/2007 01:47PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 1031 PMK140 02/21/2007 05:05PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 1724 Jim Mazerat 02/25/2007 09:10PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 1095 John J. Lentini, CFEI 02/25/2007 11:56PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 905 Jim Mazerat 02/26/2007 11:14AM
  Re: It's a paradigm 968 Jim Mazerat 02/26/2007 12:12PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 932 PMK140 02/26/2007 08:18AM
  Re: It's a paradigm 999 Jim Mazerat 02/26/2007 10:05AM
  Re: It's a paradigm 951 MIJ 02/26/2007 10:12AM
  Re: It's a paradigm 927 Jim Mazerat 02/26/2007 10:23AM
  Re: It's a paradigm 922 Jim Mazerat 02/26/2007 12:20PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 993 Jim Mazerat 02/21/2007 06:34PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 1072 Jim Mazerat 02/21/2007 07:17PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 1660 SJAvato 02/21/2007 08:02PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 947 Jim Mazerat 02/21/2007 09:00PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 1005 Jim Mazerat 02/23/2007 11:21AM
  Re: It's a paradigm 1003 Ted Pagels 02/25/2007 08:23PM
  Re: It's a paradigm 966 Jim Mazerat 02/25/2007 09:13PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.