Fire/Arson Investigations : Fire/Arson Investigations
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: National Fire Protection Association 921 Scope
Posted by: Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant (IP Logged)
Date: April 11, 2022 05:06PM
Jim:
This isn't the first time you have raised this point. If you go back under the search here you will find extensive and interesting exchanges (including you, Pat Kennedy, Stuart Sklar, John Lentini, and many others).
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
Court rulings:
[www.forumworld.com]
Also there was an older post (Pre-2001) on the website before it was upgraded and past messages were removed. One of those was a Citation with the following information recognition of NFPA 921 (as I recall a Standard of Care and Authoritative Treatise):
"
• WORKMAN VS ELECTROLUX CORP., District of Kansas, 2005 US Dist. LEXIS 16306
• ABON, LTD. VS. TRANSCONTINENTAL INS. CO., Ohio Court of Appeals 2005 Ohio 3052; 2005 Ohio App. LEXIS 2847. LEXIS 16306.
• IND. INS. CO. VS GE, Northern District of Ohio 2004 US Dist. LEXIS 13400
• TNT RD. CO. VS STERLING TRUCK CORP., District of Maine 2004 US Dist. LEXIS 13463
• TUNNEL VS FORD MOTOR CO., Western District of Virginia 330 F. Supp. 2d 707; 2004 US Dist. LEXIS 24594
• MCCOY VS WHIRLPOOL CORP., District of Kansas 2003 US Dist. LEXIS 6901
• UTAH VS. TROY LYNN SCHULTZ 2002 UT App 366; 58 P.3d 879; 460 Utah Adv. Rep. 21; 2002 Utah App. LEXIS 112.
• SNODGRASS V FORD MOTOR CO., District of New Jersey, 2002 US Dist. LEXIS 13421
• ROYAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA VS JOSEPH DANIEL CONSTRUCTION, Southern District of New York, 208 F. Supp. 2nd 423; 2002 US Dist. LEXIS 12397
• CHESTER VALLEY COACH WORKS VS FISHER-PRICE, INC., Eastern District of Pennsylvania 2001 US Dist. LEXIS 15902
• TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY CORP. VS GE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT, 150 F. 2nd Supp. 360; 57 Fed. R. Evid. Servo (Callaghan) 695; CCH Prod Liab. Rep. P16, 181; 2001 US Dist. LEXIS 14395
• KUMHO TIRE CO. V. CARMICHAEL, 526 U.S. 137, 143 L. Ed. 2d 238, 119 S. Ct. 1167 (1999)."
Chris Bloom
This isn't the first time you have raised this point. If you go back under the search here you will find extensive and interesting exchanges (including you, Pat Kennedy, Stuart Sklar, John Lentini, and many others).
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
[www.forumworld.com]
Court rulings:
[www.forumworld.com]
Also there was an older post (Pre-2001) on the website before it was upgraded and past messages were removed. One of those was a Citation with the following information recognition of NFPA 921 (as I recall a Standard of Care and Authoritative Treatise):
"
• WORKMAN VS ELECTROLUX CORP., District of Kansas, 2005 US Dist. LEXIS 16306
• ABON, LTD. VS. TRANSCONTINENTAL INS. CO., Ohio Court of Appeals 2005 Ohio 3052; 2005 Ohio App. LEXIS 2847. LEXIS 16306.
• IND. INS. CO. VS GE, Northern District of Ohio 2004 US Dist. LEXIS 13400
• TNT RD. CO. VS STERLING TRUCK CORP., District of Maine 2004 US Dist. LEXIS 13463
• TUNNEL VS FORD MOTOR CO., Western District of Virginia 330 F. Supp. 2d 707; 2004 US Dist. LEXIS 24594
• MCCOY VS WHIRLPOOL CORP., District of Kansas 2003 US Dist. LEXIS 6901
• UTAH VS. TROY LYNN SCHULTZ 2002 UT App 366; 58 P.3d 879; 460 Utah Adv. Rep. 21; 2002 Utah App. LEXIS 112.
• SNODGRASS V FORD MOTOR CO., District of New Jersey, 2002 US Dist. LEXIS 13421
• ROYAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA VS JOSEPH DANIEL CONSTRUCTION, Southern District of New York, 208 F. Supp. 2nd 423; 2002 US Dist. LEXIS 12397
• CHESTER VALLEY COACH WORKS VS FISHER-PRICE, INC., Eastern District of Pennsylvania 2001 US Dist. LEXIS 15902
• TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY CORP. VS GE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT, 150 F. 2nd Supp. 360; 57 Fed. R. Evid. Servo (Callaghan) 695; CCH Prod Liab. Rep. P16, 181; 2001 US Dist. LEXIS 14395
• KUMHO TIRE CO. V. CARMICHAEL, 526 U.S. 137, 143 L. Ed. 2d 238, 119 S. Ct. 1167 (1999)."
Chris Bloom
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.