Fire/Arson Investigations : Fire/Arson Investigations
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: If you were a Judge
Posted by: PMK140 (IP Logged)
Date: May 27, 2007 08:07PM
Dr. Hurst,
This post was very interesting. It seems to be completely counter to may commonly held positions on combustion and fire dynamics.
Can you cite any literature where we can find the source of this "interesting proposition," the definitions of a "reverse flame," or “oxygen burning,” or any circumstances wherein "the overhead space" is NOT "...significantly cooler than the flame?"
Pat Kennedy, CFEI, CFPS, MIFireE
Fire and Explosion Analyst
Sarasota, Florida
[www.kennedy-fire.com]
This post was very interesting. It seems to be completely counter to may commonly held positions on combustion and fire dynamics.
Can you cite any literature where we can find the source of this "interesting proposition," the definitions of a "reverse flame," or “oxygen burning,” or any circumstances wherein "the overhead space" is NOT "...significantly cooler than the flame?"
Pat Kennedy, CFEI, CFPS, MIFireE
Fire and Explosion Analyst
Sarasota, Florida
[www.kennedy-fire.com]
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.