Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: If you were a Judge Some 921 citations
Posted by: PMK140 (IP Logged)
Date: June 05, 2007 08:01AM

Here are some pertinent citations from NFPA 921:

21.3.1 Low-Order Damage. Low-order damage is characterized by walls bulged out or laid down, virtually intact, next to the structure. Roofs may be lifted slightly and returned to their approximate original position. Windows may be dislodged, sometimes without glass being broken. Debris produced is generally large and is thrown short distances. Low-order damage is produced by slow rates of pressure rise.

21.8.2 Interpretation of Explosion Damage. The explosion damage to structures (low-order and high-order) is related to a number of factors. These include the fuel–air ratio, vapor density of the fuel, turbulence effects, volume of the confining space, location and magnitude of the ignition source, venting, and the characteristic strength of the structure.

21.8.2.1* Fuel–Air Ratio. Often the nature of damage to the confining structure can be an indicator of the fuel–air mixture at the time of ignition.

21.8.2.1.6 Explosions of mixtures near the LEL do not tend to produce large quantities of postexplosion fire, as nearly all of the available fuel is consumed during the explosive propagation.

21.8.2.1.7 Explosions of mixtures near the UEL tend to produce postexplosion fires because of the fuel-rich mixtures. The delayed combustion of the remaining fuel produces the postexplosion fire. Often, a portion of the mixture over the UEL has fuel that does not burn until it is mixed with air during the explosion’s venting phase or negative pressure phase, thereby producing the characteristic following fire.

21.8.2.1.8 When optimum (i.e., most violent) explosions occur, it is almost always at mixtures near or just above the stoichiometric mixture (i.e., slightly fuel rich). This is the optimum mixture. These mixtures produce the most efficient combustion and, therefore, the highest flame speeds, rates of pressure rise, maximum pressures, and consequently the most damage. Postexplosion fires can occur if there are pockets of overly rich mixture.

Table 21.13.3.1 Typical Explosion Characteristics

21.13.3.2 Identify Explosion or Fire. The first task in the initial assessment is to determine whether the incident was a fire, explosion, or both, and which came first.

21.13.4.2 Identify Preblast and Postblast Fire Damage. Fire or heat damage should be identified as having been caused by a pre-existing fire or by the thermal effect of the explosion. Debris that has been propelled away from the point of origin should be examined to determine whether it has been burned. Debris of this nature that is burned may be an indicator that a fire preceded the explosion.

21.13.4.2.1 Probably the most common sign of an overpressure condition is window glass thrown some distance from the windows of the structure. The residue of smoke or soot on fragments of window glass or other structural debris reveals that the explosion followed a fire by some time, whereas perfectly clean pieces of glass or debris thrown large distances from the structure indicate an explosion preceding the fire.

Pat Kennedy, CFEI, CFPS, MIFireE
Fire and Explosion Analyst
Sarasota, Florida
[www.kennedy-fire.com]



Subject Views Written By Posted
  If you were a Judge 1952 Russaus 05/18/2007 07:30AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 1095 dcarpenter 05/24/2007 06:02AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 928 Russaus 05/27/2007 01:35AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 985 Gerald Hurst 05/27/2007 02:32PM
  Re: If you were a Judge 945 PMK140 05/27/2007 08:07PM
  Re: If you were a Judge 918 Gerald Hurst 05/28/2007 03:04PM
  Re: If you were a Judge - the hypothesis in full. 1066 Russaus 05/28/2007 09:12PM
  Re: If you were a Judge - the hypothesis in full. 914 PMK140 05/28/2007 10:27PM
  Re: If you were a Judge - the hypothesis in full. 957 John J. Lentini, CFEI 05/30/2007 09:32PM
  Re: If you were a Judge 893 dcarpenter 06/01/2007 06:44AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 871 Gerald Hurst 06/01/2007 11:03PM
  Re: If you were a Judge 865 dcarpenter 06/02/2007 09:05AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 883 Gerald Hurst 06/02/2007 10:57AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 951 Russaus 06/05/2007 03:46AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 852 PMK140 06/05/2007 07:35AM
  Re: If you were a Judge Some 921 citations 900 PMK140 06/05/2007 08:01AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.