Fire/Arson Investigations :  Fire/Arson Investigations The fastest message board... ever.
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator. 
Re: If you were a Judge
Posted by: Gerald Hurst (IP Logged)
Date: June 01, 2007 11:03PM

This discussion had not progressed very far when I inadvertently side-tracked it by introducing the topic of inverse flames.

After thinking about the original problem of whether a collapsing portion of ceiling under a pyrolyzate-rich, hot attic could cause a backdraft explosion, I have come to believe that it may well be reasonably possible.

The pressure of the cool gas at ceiling level below the attic will be higher than the pressure of the hot gas at floor level in the attic because of the effect of temperature on density.

If we assume that the upper attic structure is “leaky,” (as is typically the case) and that the room below has some access to outside air via leaks or an open door or window, the cold air will be driven at least slowly into the attic and progress to some point short of the neutral plane in the attic. Under these condition, the cooler air will tend spill across the attic floor the same way it would if it came in from the usual vertical sources (gravity currents). The rate of this flow will be limited by the rate at which hot air can leak through the upper elevations of the attic or the rate at which fresh air can enter the room below, depending on which process is slower.

If the amount of oxygen in the attic increases sufficiently before the mixture finds an ignition source such as a small flame in a remote area of the attic or a glowing ember which erupts into flame, all the conditions necessary for an for an explosion will be satisfied.

Of course, I may be dead wrong. If so, I’m sure I can rely on the readers to straighten me out. smiling smiley



Subject Views Written By Posted
  If you were a Judge 1952 Russaus 05/18/2007 07:30AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 1095 dcarpenter 05/24/2007 06:02AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 928 Russaus 05/27/2007 01:35AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 985 Gerald Hurst 05/27/2007 02:32PM
  Re: If you were a Judge 945 PMK140 05/27/2007 08:07PM
  Re: If you were a Judge 918 Gerald Hurst 05/28/2007 03:04PM
  Re: If you were a Judge - the hypothesis in full. 1066 Russaus 05/28/2007 09:12PM
  Re: If you were a Judge - the hypothesis in full. 914 PMK140 05/28/2007 10:27PM
  Re: If you were a Judge - the hypothesis in full. 957 John J. Lentini, CFEI 05/30/2007 09:32PM
  Re: If you were a Judge 893 dcarpenter 06/01/2007 06:44AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 871 Gerald Hurst 06/01/2007 11:03PM
  Re: If you were a Judge 865 dcarpenter 06/02/2007 09:05AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 883 Gerald Hurst 06/02/2007 10:57AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 951 Russaus 06/05/2007 03:46AM
  Re: If you were a Judge 852 PMK140 06/05/2007 07:35AM
  Re: If you were a Judge Some 921 citations 901 PMK140 06/05/2007 08:01AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.