Fire/Arson Investigations : Fire/Arson Investigations
A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: Notification of Interested Parties
Posted by: Chris Bloom, CJBFireConsultant (IP Logged)
Date: August 15, 2008 04:40PM
John:
If the plaintiff sends Notices of Intent to Subrogate, that has been identified by counsel as a CLAIM. The basis of the justification for going after recouping costs is that filing a false claim will incur expenses that normally would not have been incurred if the plaintiff's experts had not been negligent in the identification of potential parties.
This to my knowledge HAS NEVER been an issue with a Notice of Intent to Inspect. You are not blaming the opposing party (justified or wrongly), just informing them of your intent to proceed forward.
chris
If the plaintiff sends Notices of Intent to Subrogate, that has been identified by counsel as a CLAIM. The basis of the justification for going after recouping costs is that filing a false claim will incur expenses that normally would not have been incurred if the plaintiff's experts had not been negligent in the identification of potential parties.
This to my knowledge HAS NEVER been an issue with a Notice of Intent to Inspect. You are not blaming the opposing party (justified or wrongly), just informing them of your intent to proceed forward.
chris
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.