A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: Standard of Care Requirements for Fire Investigators
Posted by:
Jim Mazerat (IP Logged)
Date: February 28, 2007 04:15PM
I am glad you think so highly of our judicial system, I would bet based on experience out there many people agree with you. What you read was a bench approved jury instruction that was agreed upon in 1986 with the words structural engineer being replaced by fire investigator. This came from a paper presented by a structural engineer.
The statement was used by Dr. Joshua Kardon in his presentation at the Online Ethics Center 1999 International Conference on Ethics in Engineering and Computer Science. I understand he might not be up to some of our standards but he is a structural engineer that has been in continuous practice since 1973 and established Joshua B. Kardon + Company in 1978. He has the following degrees, B.S., Civil Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 1971, M.S., Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1997, and a Ph.D., Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2003. The fact that a professional like this used that information and the fact that it is considered to be a bunch approved jury instruction would really make me hesitate to call it voodoo.
Gerald your statement, “The idea of setting a criterion based on what local "reputable" investigators do is a bit scary,” surprises me a little. Is this not what you and others are saying when it comes to determining a standard of care for our profession. Is not the idea that a criterion (standard) for accepting 921 as the standard of care for fire investigators being put forth by “reputable” investigators? Should the rest of us consider that scary?
For once I was starting to kind of agree with the thought process of how one is determined a standard of care for a profession and you insinuate it is like voodoo. Of all people, because of where I live, I am familiar with voodoo. Believe me I respect voodoo more and you know. You are almost right about the shaman (spiritualist, medium, sage). Here it is the high priestess that sets the standard of care for voodoo.