A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: Back to basics – testing your hypothesis.
Posted by:
cda (IP Logged)
Date: January 11, 2007 12:12PM
A welcome your views, and I am trying to learn.
It seems that I hear in some seminars that if you do not have a fire that is straight out of the book than you have to have the fire looked at by several engineers, scientist or what ever you want to call them to make the fire vaild under the scenitific method??
Or, is it that the investigator some how has to pull out of NFPA 921 the sections that supprt the theory?? And is the investigator back to making the book fit the fire????
Or is it that the fire and the metjod used has to go to court and the judge decides if it is right or wrong????