A place to ask questions and add to probative and informative discussions associated with the various aspects of the field of fire investigation. -- FORUM RULES---BE CIVIL AND NO NAME CALLING, NO BELITTLING, NO BERATING, NO DENIGRATING others. Postings in violation of these rules can be removed or editted to remove the offending remarks at the discretion of the moderators and/or site administrator.
Re: Cause of the Fire
Posted by:
Alitigator (IP Logged)
Date: July 21, 2006 03:33PM
Jim,
I hear what you guys are saying, and I know you use 921 as a guide in your profession. I just want you to realize that courts transform "guidelines" into "standards" with regularity. Some have more force than others; a violation of an OSHA standard can give rise to strict liability, for example.
I'm a little sensitive on this subject because of handling a very important case recently where the opposing expert rendered an opinion he said conformed to 921 and my experts proved it didn't. The opposition expert survived a Daubert hearing (for the reasons I put forth in my original post) and, if the case ever goes to trial, it will be a swearing match between experts.
There's probably too much "art" involved to boil it down to a single phrase; I think that's why the wording can get cumbersome.
My purpose is simply to make sure you know that, on my side of the fence, a "guide" used by an expert witness is usually a "standard."
As always,
Jim.